Money Wasted

Lake Worth Utilities
Waste Meter
... for an arc flash study that Mr. Reyes was qualified to do in house and at no cost to taxpayers.
... the estimated engineering cost of the express feeder which could also be done in house at no cost to taxpayers.
... wasted when insurance requirements were circumvented by the city manager and utility director.
... wasted when plant manager Dave Mulvay’s first attempt at writing a scope of work contained a defect that cost taxpayers an extra $123,098 for tainting the bidding process and giving unfair advantage to one bidder over another. - April 2009
... wasted when the Matrix organizational study to save taxpayers money was scrapped in favor of higher cost outsourcing by city manager Stanton.
... wasted engineering design cost of water piping and tanks (original county water deal) that will never be built.
... wasted when additional costs were incurred for not following insurance procedure on transformer repair.
... wasted when the commission unanimously voted to order transformers when we had equivalent replacements already in stock since the upgrade. - 15 Sep. 2009
Total Taxpayer Dollars Wasted:

LWM Menu

· Home
· Advertising
· Authors and Articles
· AvantGo
· Downloads
· Feedback
· Forums
· Groups
· HTML Newsletter
· Journal
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links

Who's Online

There are currently, 28 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are an Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Site Info

Your IP:

Welcome, Anonymous
· Secure Login/Registration
· Forgot Password?
Server Date/Time
27 November 2021 18:04:32 EST

  On File: Buyer beware - CARMAX/ARRIGO
Posted on Friday, November 30, 2007 @ 08:21:35 EST by admin

Consumer Info

BUYER BEWARE - CARMAX & Arrigo Dodge/Jeep Stealership

This is a two fold problem, so let's see just what happened so you won't make the same mistake with either company. Above is the bill to replace 4 brake rotors which were "out of spec" according to Arrigo mechanics.

The 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (26,000 miles) was purchased from CarMax in April for $20,000+. CARMAX advertizements say they check everything to make sure it's to specifications... safety systems such as brakes receiving special attention. The salesman told the customer that "the brakes are new" and even asked for the car back at one point to "touch them up a bit." But in fact, it was only the BRAKE PADS that were new. At first everything was fine but after 6 months, the car began pulsating when the brakes were applied. This was a potentially dangerous situation that reduced the effectiveness of the brakes. The owner had purchased an extended warranty and was certain that the problem would be fixed under warranty.

Previously, the car's engine warning light had flashed and CARMAX told the owner that only a Jeep dealer (Arrigo) could deal with that problem. Turns out the warning was bogus and the dealer reset the computer. So at this point, the owner made arrangements to get the brake work done at ARRIGO... the first mistake, as you can see by the outrageous prices charged for service. It has often been said that new cars are not where dealers make money, it's on the service.

But if we believe ARRIGO mechanics, the real deception came from CARMAX who failed to live up to their stated standards of thoroughly going over the car and replacing the rotors. However, it doesn't seem normal that rotors are too thin at 36,000 miles. If they were too thin, then they must have been turned at least twice which seems unlikely. Either way the owner was at risk perhaps to save a few bucks. CARMAX said they were not bound to provide any credit toward the brake job, admitting that ARRIGO DODGE/JEEP prices were well beyond reasonable. And further, they said they would have done the same job for much less.


If you buy from CARMAX, beware... paying top dollar for a clean looking car might still cost you nearly a thousand dollars 6 months down the road... extended warranty or not... IF you take it to a dealer to have it serviced. Either way it appears that CARMAX missed something they should have known about. In this case, the safety of the vehicle may be limited to this one car... but maybe not. Regardless of circumstances, the brakes needed fixing and they shouldn't have.

And of course, unless you want to hear that ripping sound from your wallet, don't get your car serviced at the Arrigo Stealership.


Buyer beware - CARMAX/ARRIGO | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.


No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register


Related Links

· More about Consumer Info
· News by admin

Most read story about Consumer Info:
Review of BlueAnt V1 and Plantronics Voyager Pro - the two most expensive blueto


Article Rating

Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

To rate this article please Login first



 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


Associated Topics

Consumer Info

The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is editorial 2007 by William Coakley and unauthorized use is prohibited by law. Anybody who uses, copies or distributes this material in any manner, for commercial or personal purposes, without written permission, would be committing an infringement of copyright.
You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php or ultramode.txt

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.08 Seconds