Money Wasted

Lake Worth Utilities
Waste Meter
... for an arc flash study that Mr. Reyes was qualified to do in house and at no cost to taxpayers.
... the estimated engineering cost of the express feeder which could also be done in house at no cost to taxpayers.
... wasted when insurance requirements were circumvented by the city manager and utility director.
... wasted when plant manager Dave Mulvay’s first attempt at writing a scope of work contained a defect that cost taxpayers an extra $123,098 for tainting the bidding process and giving unfair advantage to one bidder over another. - April 2009
... wasted when the Matrix organizational study to save taxpayers money was scrapped in favor of higher cost outsourcing by city manager Stanton.
... wasted engineering design cost of water piping and tanks (original county water deal) that will never be built.
... wasted when additional costs were incurred for not following insurance procedure on transformer repair.
... wasted when the commission unanimously voted to order transformers when we had equivalent replacements already in stock since the upgrade. - 15 Sep. 2009
Total Taxpayer Dollars Wasted:

LWM Menu

· Home
· Advertising
· Authors and Articles
· AvantGo
· Downloads
· Feedback
· Forums
· Groups
· HTML Newsletter
· Journal
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Statistics
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links

Who's Online

There are currently, 22 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are an Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Site Info

Your IP:

Welcome, Anonymous
· Secure Login/Registration
· Forgot Password?
Server Date/Time
27 November 2021 18:47:38 EST

  Will WPB water become an option?
Posted on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 @ 13:08:25 EST by admin


Will WPB water be on the agenda?

Editorial by William Coakley

January 29, 2008 - The three options immediately open to Lake Worth to supply 3 - 5 million gallons of supplemental water are: 1. the RO (Reverse Osmosis) water system we have so far invested about 15 million into 2. buying county water or 3. buying water from WPB.

What's worst for the city: allowing Mock Roos to continue racking up millions in waste without putting the remaining portion of the contract out to bid... and leaving their grandfather status in place so they could drain more from us in the future without competitive bidding.

What's best for the city: stop the RO project now and dismantle the good ole boy grandfathering status of Mock Roos while we study some real options for water supply including joint ventures, partnerships, or coop'ing to see if we can redeem the project and... putting the remaining portion of the RO project out to bid to see if the anticipated 10 million savings from the Mock Roos estimate could be realized.

The purpose of tonight's meeting is to view solutions to the city's future water needs as presented by LW staff. However, an obvious player is missing... West Palm Beach water. According to the WPB water department, we already have an existing water supply contract, a 16 inch line that could supply our needs, plus we can pump the water anytime which would eliminate the need for an expensive water storage system, they can guarantee 70 psi pressure, and the best part is, we don't have to spend 12 million dollars upfront just to get the water as we will have to do with getting county water. It's a much better looking deal... so why has staff NOT included it on the agenda? LWM researched this option over two weeks ago and this information was given to the city manager at that time ...yet until a few days ago, LW had not even contacted WPB water. Are we being steered to yet another "most costly option" as Mr Faried has consistently done? Why are residents and people who aren't being paid... doing the job that city staff is being paid nearly a half million in salaries to do?

The ill fated RO (Reverse Osmosis) project is at double budget figures ($12.3M now $ 24.2M) under Mock Roos management. And the first likely casualty of this budget-rumbling cost overrun could be the cozy little "grandfather status" Mock Roos enjoys as the city's only bidder on public works projects. As is true with most monopolies, they usually operate in their own interest at the expense of the customer. And this fact didn't go undetected by the Internal auditor who recommended in his report that this city practice should be terminated it may well get hacked tonight.

And the RO project itself may develop a new appeal if this happens. LWM has learned from three independent sources that the real cost of the RO plant should be around 12 million dollars and not the gastly 24 million dollars projected by Mock Roos and we know those predictable Mock Roos "change orders" will certainly accelerate even that cost. But Mock Roos maintains that the 24.4 million figure is such a good deal that surely the cost will increase if we don't snap the deal right now.

Like many of the city's contracts, utility contracts often become little more than gravy trains for contractors and consultants to feed on at the public troth. This is especially true when the most expensive solution can be secured through the manipulation of input to the commission. Although WPB water has experienced less than flattering media attention they are certainly in a position to be our best option and I fully expect to hear something concrete concerning WPB water presented before any decisions are made other than de-monopolizing Mock Roos in Lake Worth.


Will WPB water become an option? | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.


No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register



Re: Will WPB water become an option? (Score: 1)
by SaveOurBeach on Tuesday, January 29, 2008 @ 14:02:05 EST
(User Info | Send a Message)

Tell us more about WPB water--I thought they had lousy water, full of bacteria and ugh. Has all that been cleared up?


Related Links

· More about Editorials
· News by admin

Most read story about Editorials:
Historical Map of Corruption PBCo


Article Rating

Average Score: 5
Votes: 1

To rate this article please Login first



 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


Associated Topics

EditorialsLW Utilities

The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is editorial 2007 by William Coakley and unauthorized use is prohibited by law. Anybody who uses, copies or distributes this material in any manner, for commercial or personal purposes, without written permission, would be committing an infringement of copyright.
You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php or ultramode.txt

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.07 Seconds